Ultrafast Linear Kinetic Inductive Photoresponse of YBa2Cu3O7-{\delta}
Meander-Line Structures by Photoimpedance Measurements

Show preview

Hide preview

ar X
iv :1
01 1.
09 62
v2 [
ph ys
ics .in
s-d et]
4 Fe
b 2 01
1 Ultrafast Linear Kinetic Inductive Photoresponse of YBa2Cu3O7−δ Meander-Line Structures by Photoimpedance Measurements
Haig A. Atikian,1, a) Behnood G. Ghamsari,2 Steven M. Anlage,2 and A. Hamed Majedi1 1) Electrical and Computer Engineering Department and the Institute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo,
Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada 2) Center for Nanophysics and Advanced Materials, Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD,
20742-4111, USA
(Dated: 8 February 2011)
We report the experimental demonstration of the linear kinetic-inductive photoresponse of thin-film YBa2Cu3O7−δ (YBCO) meander-line structures, where the photoresponse amplitude, full-width-half- maximum (FWHM), and rise-time are bilinear in the incident optical power and bias current. This bilinear behavior reveals a trade-off between obtaining high responsivity and high speed photodetection. We also report a rise-time as short as 29ps in our photoimpedance measurements.
The interaction of light with superconducting samples is long known to perturb superconductivity1–4, which can be used as a probing mechanism for optoelectronic applications5–13. In general, photons of energy greater than the Cooper pair binding energy (2∆) can initiate a chain of pair-breaking events resulting in a deviation of the quasiparticle and pair densities from their equi- librium values. Typically, these distributions depend on temperature, optical power and wavelength, thermal boundary conditions, and material properties such as electron-electron and electron-phonon interactions times, electron density, coherence length, penetration depth, and geometry6,14. While determining the spatial and temporal distribution of quasiparticles and pairs under a time-varying optical illumination is a profound prob- lem in non-equilibrium superconductivity, many of the important concepts of such an interaction for device ap- plications can be captured by means of a much simpler and more phenomenological approach, namely the ki- netic inductance model13. Within the kinetic inductance model the presence of the superconductive condensate, at a macroscopic level, can be adequately modeled by an additional inductive channel for charge transport. The optically initiated pair breaking mechanism, within this framework, should be interpreted as the spatial and tem- poral variations of the kinetic inductance and the normal resistance of the superconducting specimen. Many researchers have experimentally studied the ki-
netic inductive photoresponse of superconducting thin films through photoimpedance measurements6,15. In photoimpedance measurements, light induced changes in the microwave impedance of the superconducting struc- ture are measured by an external high-frequency circuit. In its simplest form, the specimen is externally biased with a dc current and connected to a fast oscilloscope in series with a high bandwidth amplifier; absorption of op- tical photons then changes the impedance of the sample and produces a transient voltage response. A number
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic address: haatikia@maxwell.uwaterloo.ca
of previous works have reported photoimpedance mea- surements on different superconductors mainly conclud- ing that: 1) the resistive photoresponse dominates at temperatures well below the critical temperature (Tc), whereas the kinetic inductive response becomes the main mechanism of photoresponse close to Tc; 2) In the kinetic inductive regime the photoresponse could be very fast, with a rise time as low as 50ps, and is mainly limited by the time constants of the peripheral measuring appara- tus; 3) the dependence of the photoresponse amplitude varies nonlinearly with the incident optical power. The nonlinearity of the kinetic inductive photore-
sponse intrinsically arises from the nonlinear dependence of the kinetic inductance of a superconducting sample on the Cooper pair density. Therefore, even though changes in the Cooper pair density, under certain conditions, may vary linearly with the incident optical power, the resul- tant variation of the kinetic inductance is generally non- linear. This point can be readily observed for a thin-film sample16:
Lk = m∗ℓ
n∗(q∗)2A , (1)
where Lk is the kinetic inductance, ℓ and A are the length and the cross section area of the sample, m∗ and q∗ re- spectively are the mass and charge of a Cooper pair, and n∗ is the density of Cooper pairs. Accordingly, the ki- netic inductive photoresponse approximately reads7
Vph = d
dt (LkI0), (2)
where I0 is the bias current. Nevertheless, we have the- oretically shown elsewhere17,18 that if the optical power and the bias current are far from their critical values, and the temperature is not too close to Tc the kinetic inductive response can be linearized giving a frequency- dependent voltage responsivity
Rv(ω) ≡ Vph(ω)
Po(ω) =
( ηQτQI0
2∆Aℓn∗
)( jωLk0Rn0
jωLk0 +Rn0
) , (3)
where Po and ω are the incident optical power and mod- ulation frequency, ηQ is the pair breaking efficiency, τQ

2 (a)
−20 −10 0 10 20−1.5
−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
V (m
V)
I (mA) (b)
FIG. 1: (a) Image of the 5µm meander-line (b) Measured current-voltage characteristics of the 5µm
meander-line at 77K.
is the Cooper pairs recombination life time, and Rn0 and Lk0 are the equilibrium normal resistance and kinetic in- ductance of the sample in the absence of illumination. This regime of operation is particularly useful for opto- electronic device applications such as photodetectors and optically tunable microwave-photonic devices such as de- lay lines, resonators, and filters where linear tunability is highly desirable19. To serve as a detecting element, we have used a 100nm-
thick YBCO thin film (THEVA, Ismaning, Germany) meander line structure with 5-µm line widths and slots, covering an area of 176µm×200µm. The meander line structure is placed at the midpoint of the center strip of a 50GHz-bandwidth 50Ω superconducting coplanar waveg- uide (CPW) transmission line. Figure 1 shows the image of the meander line and the current-voltage characteris- tics at 77K. The critical current is found to be 13mA, and the bias current is selected to be below this value. The meander line is externally dc biased through high bandwidth bias-tees. One end of the CPW is terminated with a 50Ω load to suppress any reflected signals. The other end is connected to a high-bandwidth microwave amplifier with a gain of 28dB, followed by a fast oscil- loscope where the response to a train of 1550nm wave- length, 45ps-wide Gaussian optical pulses is measured. A block diagram of the measurement setup is shown in Figure 2. More details in regards to the photoimpedance experimental setup can be found in20. Figure 3 illustrates typical photoresponse waveforms
for different bias currents at an incident optical power of 1.6mW. The inset of Figure 3 illustrates an operat- ing point where we have measured rise times as short as 29ps. Figure 4a shows that the photoresponse ampli- tudes of the detector, for fixed bias currents, varies lin- early with the incident optical power. Moreover, Figure 4b demonstrates that the responsivity of the device has a linear dependence on the bias current. These two obser- vations confirm our previous theoretical prediction of the linear kinetic inductive response represented by equation (3). This linear response sustains as long as the pertur- bation in both kinetic inductance and normal resistance is small. This also implies that the fractional change in both the Cooper pair density and quasiparticles is small. These values, in general, depend on temperature, bias
Bias
Tee
Bias
Tee
1550nm
Pulsed Laser
Laser Pulse
50
Load
Microwave
Amplifier
High-Speed
Oscilloscope Current
Source
FIG. 2: Block diagram of the photoimpedance measurement setup of the meander line structure.
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0
50
100
150
200
250
time (ns)
Ph ot
or es
po ns
e (m
V)


I0=15.5mA I0=14.5mA I0=13.5mA I0=12.5mA I0=11.5mA I0=10.5mA I0= 9.5mA I0= 8.5mA I0= 7.5mA
0 200 400 600 800 1000 0
2
4
6
8
10
time (ps) Ph
ot or
es po
ns e
(m V)
FIG. 3: Photoresponse waveforms for the 5µm meander-line under 1.6mW of incident optical power with a varying bias at 77K and 28dB amplification. (Inset) Photoresponse waveform under 1.2mW of
incident optical power and 7.5mA bias current with a 29ps risetime.
1 2 3 4 50
5
10
15
20
25
30
Incident Optical Power (mW)
Ph ot
or es
po ns
e Am
pl itu
de (m
V)


I0= 7.5mA I0= 8.5mA I0= 9.5mA I0=10.5mA I0=11.5mA
(a)
7 8 9 10 11 124
6
8
10
12
Bias Current (mA)
R es
po ns
ivi ty
(m V/
W )
(b)
FIG. 4: (a) Photoresponse amplitude versus incident optical power with a varying bias current for. (b)
Responsivity versus bias current.

3 1 2 3 4 50
1
2
3
4
Incident Optical Power (mW)
FW H
M (n
s)


I0= 7.5mA I0= 8.5mA I0= 9.5mA I0=10.5mA I0=11.5mA
(a)
7 8 9 10 11 12500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
Bias Current (mA)
d FW
HM /d
P o
(ps /m
W )
(b)
FIG. 5: (a) FWHM of the photoresponse waveform versus incident optical power with varying bias currents. (b) The slope of the changes in FWHM with optical
power as a function of bias current.
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.50
50
100
150
Incident Optical Power (mW)
R is
e Ti
m e
(ps )


I0= 7.5mA I0= 8.5mA I0= 9.5mA I0=10.5mA I0=11.5mA
(a)
7 8 9 10 11 120
20
40
60
80
Bias Current (mA)
dτ r/d
P o
(ps /m
W )
(b)
FIG. 6: (a) Rise-time versus incident optical power with varying bias currents (b) The slope of the changes in rise-time with optical power as a function of bias
current.
current, and average incident optical power. The linear regime of operation for this device, at a given temper- ature, is clearly illustrated by the range of current and optical power values in Figure 4.
The FWHM of the photoresponse is a measure of the photoinduced disturbance in the detector, which accord- ing to (2) equals to (δLkI0). The perturbation in the kinetic inductance, δLk, in the linear kinetic inductive regime, linearly varies with optical power and is indepen- dent of the bias current18. Thus, the (δLkI0) product, and consequently the FWHM, should be bilinear in the optical power and bias current which is clearly shown by Figure 5. This point readily reveals the trade off between obtaining high responsivity and short photore- sponse waveforms in linear kinetic inductive detectors, because the former requires a higher bias current whereas the latter demands a small bias current.
In addition to amplitude and FWHM, the rise time
of the photoresponse waveform is also bilinear in optical power and bias current, as illustrated by Figure 6. In terms of an electrical circuit model, the detector acts like an RL circuit with time varying R and L, and a constant total current I0
18. In this scenario, the rise time depends on the (δLkI0), which was shown to be bilinear in current and optical power. This point once again manifests itself as a trade-off between speed and responsivity in the linear regime. A set of similar results was obtained for a meander line with 3µm line and slot widths, for which the same trends as the presented device was observed. In conclusion, we have characterized the linear kinetic
inductive photoresponse of thin-film YBCO meander line structures, where the photoresponse amplitude, FWHM, and rise time of the waveforms are bilinear in optical power and bias current. For a given operating point, we have been able to measure a short 29ps rise time in the linear kinetic inductive regime. We acknowledge support from OCE (Ontario Center of
Excellence), NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada), and the ONR/Maryland Applied Electromagnetics Center Task D10 (contract No. N000140911190).
1C. S. Owen and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1559–1561 (1972).
2G. A. Sai-Halasz, C. C. Chi, A. Denenstein, and D. N. Langen- berg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 215–219 (1974).
3N. Perrin and C. Vanneste, Phys. Rev. B 28, 5150–5159 (1983). 4A. Frenkel, Phys. Rev. B 48, 9717–9725 (1993). 5L. R. Testardi, Phys. Rev. B 4, 2189–2196 (1971). 6N. Bluzer, Phys. Rev. B 44, 10222–10233 (1991). 7R. Adam, M. Currie, R. Sobolewski, O. Harnack, and M. Darula, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 9, 4091–4094 (1999).
8Y. Enomoto and T. Murakami, J. Appl. Phys. 59, 38073814 (1986).
9H. S. Kwok, J. P. Zheng, and Q. Y. Ying, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 2473–2475 (1989).
10M. Leung, P. R. Broussard, J. H. Claassen, M. Usofsky, S. A. Wolf, and U. Strum, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 2046–2049 (1987).
11W. S. Brocklesby, D. Monroe, A. F. J. Levi, M. Hong, S. H. Liou, J. Kwo, C. E. Rice, P. M. Mankiewich, and R. E. Howard, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 11751177 (1989).
12M. G. Forrester, M. Gottlieb, J. R. Gavaler, and A. I. Braginski, IEEE Trans. Magnet. 25, 1327–1330 (1989).
13F. A. Hegmann and J. S. Preston, Phys. Rev. B 48, 16023–16039 (1993).
14J. A. Pals, K. Weiss, P. M. T. M. van Atfekum, R. E. Horstman, and J. Wolter, Phys. Rep. 89, 323–390 (1982).
15M. Johnson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 1371–1373 (1991). 16T. P. Orlando and K. A. Delin, (Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, 1991).
17B. G. Ghamsari and A. H. Majedi, Trans. Appl. Supercond. 18, 1761–1768 (2008).
18B. G. Ghamsari, Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo (2010). 19H. A. Atikian, B. G. Ghamsari, and A. H. Majedi, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 58, 3320–3326 (2010).
20H. A. Atikian, Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo (2009).